Zhenxiong Dong vs Jun Ji He Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 10 Jun at 06:53 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
Z. Dong vs J. Ji He

CHN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CHN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Dong 1 - 0 He
They have played 2 sets in total, with Zhenxiong Dong winning 2 and Jun Ji He winning 0. The last match between Zhenxiong Dong and Jun Ji He was at the M15 Luan, 10-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Zhenxiong Dong getting the victory 7-6(7) 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Dong | 1 |
| He | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Luan(06-10-25)
Z. Dong vs J. J. He H2H Profile
Z. Dong vs J. J. He Match Preview:
- Analyzing second serve performance, Dong has a notable edge with a success rate of 47.59%, while He's performance is 0%.
- For return games, Dong again outperforms He by winning 38.16% of points on opponents' second serves.
- Considering first serve returns, Dong wins 24.55% of points compared to He’s 0%.
- Under pressure, Dong's capability to save 63.64% of breakpoints highlights his mental resilience, as opposed to He’s 0%.
- In terms of match victories over the last year, He won 20% while Dong secured wins in 46.15% of his matches.
- On hard courts, Dong boasts a stronger career win percentage of 50%, compared to He's 33%.
- Regarding tournament experience, Dong holds a 50% win rate at Futures/Satellites/ITF level, double that of He at 20%.
- Diving into the caliber of opponents faced, Dong's adversaries average a higher rank than those faced by He.
- In deciding sets, Dong exhibits superiority with a win rate of 67% over the past year, while He remains winless in such scenarios.
- Assessing breakpoint opportunities, Dong converts 16.13%, which is significantly superior to He’s conversion rateof 0%.
Editorial Prediction (June 10, 2025, UTC):
Based on recent performance data, Dong appears to be the substantially stronger player in this upcoming match. His second serve efficiency offers him a clear advantage and is backed up by his ability to convert return points effectively, whether on first or second serves.
Mentally, Dong is also better equipped to handle pressure situations, saving a large percentage of breakpoints compared to his counterpart He. This ability could play a pivotal role in determining the match's outcome, especially in critical moments.
Furthermore, Dong's overall superior win rate on hard surfaces and more competitive level of play against higher-ranked opponents solidifies his position as the favorite. He's struggle to secure wins in deciding sets only further tilts the prediction in Dong's favor.
Taking all these factors into consideration, Dong emerges as the likeliest winner of this matchup.
Zhenxiong Dong vs Jun Ji He Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Z. Dong vs J. J. He H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 6 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:55:53 | Average Match Time | 1:55:53 |
| 49% (33/68) | 1st Serve % | 58% (33/57) |
| 88% (29/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (21/33) |
| 51% (18/35) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (11/24) |
| 100% (3/3) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) |
| 44% (25/57) | Return Points Win % | 31% (21/68) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
Z. Dong Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-3 5-7 10-5 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q3 | W | 5-7 6-1 10-7 | ||
J. J. He Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-1 7-5 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-5 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-6(3) 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-6(7) 3-6 10-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||

Z. Dong vs J. J. He Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 47.03% (87/98) | YTD Win/Loss | 14.29% (2/12) |
| 46.99% (195/220) | Sets Win/Loss | 22.58% (7/24) |
| 48.86% (1966/2058) | Games Win/Loss | 39.39% (117/180) |
| 50.36% (70/69) | Hard Win/Loss | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 37.50% (15/25) | Clay Win/Loss | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 33.33% (2/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/5) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 295 | Aces Total | 0 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.04 |
| 297 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 253.64 | Average Opponent Rank | 219.57 |
| 62% (3800/6095) | 1st Serve % | 59% (57/97) |
| 67% (2549/3800) | 1st Serve Win % | 49% (28/57) |
| 46% (1057/2295) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (16/40) |
| 41% (197/480) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 37% (2157/5866) | Return Points Win % | 28% (27/98) |
| 11.11% (1/8) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 48.86% (86/90) | Futures W/L | 14.29% (2/12) |
| 47% (86/184) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 14% (2/14) |
| 36% (13/36) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/5) |
| 52% (24/46) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 84% (87/73) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (4/2) |
| 16% (87/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (4/2) |
| 14% (98/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (10/0) |